Second trial for former Unicoi sheriff Kent Harris starts today

Published December 10, 2012
By Brad Hicks - Erwin Bureau Chief

ERWIN — Former Unicoi County sheriff Kent Harris is set to once again face trial today at 9 a.m. in Unicoi County Criminal Court on a theft-related charge, one of the 10 felonies a grand jury indicted him on in October 2011.

This marks the second time this year Harris has been tried on the charge of theft over $1,000. A mistrial was declared in the first trial after a jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict.

In that trial, which began in late July and ended Aug. 2, Harris was tried on charges of theft over $1,000 and criminal simulation. It is alleged Harris sought and received $4,500 in county funds to pay for two vehicles that were actually donated to the Unicoi County Sheriff’s Department in September 2008.

While District Attorney General Tony Clark said in his opening statement that the prosecution intended to prove the vehicles were donated to the county but Harris still ended up in possession of the $4,500, Harris’ legal defense stated that it would show the $4,500 was a portion of the funding that was to go to the care of two bloodhounds previously purchased by county resident Tom Colbaugh to serve as search and rescue dogs for the UCSD.

Over the course of the four-day trial, a number of documents were presented and more than a dozen witnesses provided testimony, including testimony from Harris himself. Much of the trial’s testimony also came from Colbaugh and his wife, Lynn Colbaugh, who purchased the bloodhounds and possessed the vehicles at the center of the theft charge.

The Colbaughs testified the two vehicles were donated to the county, leading them to question why checks were issued for them. The Colbaughs also testified Harris had instructed them to cash the checks totaling $4,500 and return the money to him, and they stated that Harris made no mention of bloodhound training or care in regard to the money. Harris contradicted this in his testimony.

During the course of the trial, Senior Judge Jon Kerry Blackwood stated the jury would not be considering the criminal simulation charge. According to the trial’s transcript, Blackwood issued a directed verdict on this charge.

“Ladies and gentlemen, the court as a matter of law has directed a verdict in favor of the defendant on that charge,” Blackwood said to the jury according to the transcript. “He’s not ... the court has granted a directed verdict. He is not charged with criminal simulation. You will not be considering that charge.”

After the hung jury was declared, Clark stated that he wanted to retry the case.

Harris was scheduled to begin trial Monday on a charge of official misconduct, which was the result of a Feb. 16 grand jury session. Clark said he instead wanted to use the date to retry Harris on the theft charge. Clark previously said attorneys must once again go through the process of selecting a new jury, which is expected to make up much of the trial’s first day.

In October 2011, a Unicoi County grand jury charged Harris with criminal simulation, theft over $1,000, attempted aggravated assault, tampering with evidence and six counts of official misconduct. Harris pleaded not guilty to these charges at a Feb. 7 arraignment hearing. The week after this hearing, a grand jury returned a true bill charging Harris with an additional count of official misconduct.

On March 1, Harris submitted his letter of resignation to the county, citing ongoing health problems due to injuries suffered in an August 2010 fall from the roof of the Unicoi County Jail. Harris made no mention of the felony charges in the letter. The Unicoi County Commission unanimously accepted Harris’ resignation at a March 9 meeting.

Comments
User comments are the sole responsibility of the individual posting them. By creating an account, you agree not to post comments that are off topic, obscene, abusive, or threatening in any way. Violators will be banned. Full Terms of Use

masonjar writes:

December 10, 2012
10:35 AM

I am just hoping this time that Clark don't screw up and pick another one of Kent's friends to serve as jury foreman. That costed us, the tax payers, about $10,000. Our county can't afford mistrials. Do things right and let the evidence speak for its self. There is no way in creation that I will ever believe that Kent gave $5,500 to a place to take two useless dogs off his hands. It just don't make sense.

breakout writes:

December 10, 2012
12:13 PM

How about...the prosecution calls the representative from the rescue organization to testify on whether funds were received...Or...the defense calls the representative from the rescue organization to testify that the funds were received and a financial accounting, including tax records, are submitted to the court. Is that hard to subpoena the person at the animal rescue?

countrytoo writes:

December 10, 2012
1:15 PM

The Colbaughs thought enough of Kent to will him their 1.5 million estate. When the investigation started, they were ask about the money from the cars which they knew nothing about. That's when the Colbaughs found out the type person Kent was. The jury should have ask themselves why would someone that had so much money, make up a lie on someone they liked so well. He will end up with another hung jury and have this one thrown out as well. His cousin was the foreperson on the last jury. How could that be? Tony Clark should have ask if anyone was related to him and kicked them off the jury.

* An email verification will be sent to the address
provided.
Weather

Currently
Overcast
70.0 F (21.1 C)

Last Updated on May 18 2013, 6:53 pm EDT
Traffic Cam
More popular articles

More News